The Day Of The Lord Eschatology in Quaker Perspective - Edited by Dean Freiday

Review – The Day of the Lord: Eschatology in Quaker Perspective (ed. Dean Freiday)

The Day of the Lord: Eschatology in Quaker Perspective, edited by Dean Freiday and published in 1981, is a short collection of essays exploring how Quakers understand the idea of the “end times” or the “Day of the Lord.” (Biblio)

Overall Impression

This book offers a thoughtful but quite specialised look at Christian eschatology from a Quaker viewpoint. Instead of focusing on dramatic predictions about the end of the world, it presents a quieter and more reflective approach.

—

Strengths

One of the book’s main strengths is its emphasis on “realised eschatology” – the idea that God’s kingdom is not just a future event but something that can be experienced in the present. (Friends Journal) This reflects a key Quaker belief that spiritual transformation happens inwardly and is lived out in everyday life.

The essays are also helpful in showing how Quaker thought differs from more traditional or evangelical ideas about the end times. Rather than focusing on judgment or apocalyptic events, the contributors highlight inner change, simplicity, and ethical living as central to faith.

—

Weaknesses

However, the book can feel academic and narrow in scope. Because it is a collection of essays, it lacks a strong central argument and may feel slightly disjointed.

It is also not very accessible for beginners. Readers who are unfamiliar with theological terms or Quaker beliefs may find parts of the book difficult to follow or too abstract.

—

Conclusion

Overall, The Day of the Lord: Eschatology in Quaker Perspective is a thought-provoking but somewhat challenging read. It is best suited for readers who already have an interest in theology or Quaker studies.

Strengths: thoughtful perspective, focus on present spiritual life
Weaknesses: academic tone, limited accessibility

In simple terms, the book is less about predicting the future and more about how faith should shape the present, which is both its most distinctive and most valuable insight.

(This review was generated by AI.)